Hinduism,Cosmos ,Sanatan Dharma.Ancient Hinduism science.

Non-Violence In Sanatan Dharma

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Non-Violence In Sanatan Dharma :

“Ahimsa Paramo Dharma” is a Sanskrit phrase that is often repeated today to demonstrate the universality of Ahimsa.

Loosely translated, Ahimsa means Non-violence, Paramo means topmost, ultimate, or supreme, and Dharma means duty. Thus, the entire phrase means that non-violence is the topmost duty to the extent that it supersedes all other duties.
For someone who holds this true, it means that there is no selective application of Ahimsa…it must be applied in every case and in all matters. This universal sense leads to an unconditional and unilateral abandonment of violent resistance, under any and all circumstances (as in the philosophy of Buddha and Jains).

But Sanatan Vedic Dharma does not impose total non-violence on its followers except in the case of ascetics. Ahimsa is a general Dharma that is superseded with Himsa (violence) in order to protect Dharma.
Ahimsa is only loosely translated as non-violence. Unlike the English word ‘non-violence’ (which is absolute in its meaning), Ahimsa means non-violence in a relative sense. There are times when violence can also be considered Ahimsa if that violence is used to stop greater violence.
For example, a king should always raise his rod of chastisement to keep peace and order in his country. He will fail in the discharge of his duty if he does not punish the wicked, and his country will be in a state of utter chaos. To hang a murderer is Ahimsa for a king. To kill a man who is taking away the lives of many is Ahimsa. A real Sannyasin, however, should not defend himself even when his life is in danger. A Sannyasin is one who doesn’t associate with his body, instead identifying himself with the Atman.

The statement, taken in full context and meaning within Sanatan Dharma as is applicable to most people is :
अहिंसा परमो धर्मः
धर्म हिंसा तथीव च
“Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma. ”

The phrase “Ahimsa Paramo Dharma” is mentioned several times in the Mahabharat. These instances are explained below:

Adi Parva :

The following extract is narrated by Sauti Muni talking about Rishi Sahasrapat telling Rishi Ruru about the characteristics of a Brahamana.
अहिंसा परमॊ धर्मः सर्वप्राणभृतां समृतः
तस्मात पराणभृतः सर्वान न हिंस्याथ बराह्मणः कव चित

बराह्मणः सौम्य एवेह जायतेति परा शरुतिः
वेथवेथाङ्गवित तात सर्वभूताभय परथः

अहिंसा सत्यवचनं कषमा चेति विनिश्चितम
बराह्मणस्य परॊ धर्मॊ वेथानां धरणाथ अपि

कषत्रियस्य तु यॊ धर्मः स नेहेष्यति वै तव
थण्डधारणम उग्रत्वं परजानां परिपालनम

तथ इथं कषत्रियस्यासीत कर्म

[Mahabharata 1.11.12-16]
” Verily the highest virtue of man is sparing the life of others. Therefore a Brahmana should never take the life of any creature. ”
” A Brahmana should be versed in the Vedas and Vedangas, and should inspire all creatures with belief in God. ”
” He should be benevolent to all creatures, truthful, and forgiving, even as it is his paramount duty to retain the Vedas in his memory. ”
” The duties of the Kshatriya are not thine. To be stern, to wield the sceptre and to rule the subjects properly are the duties of the Kshatriya. ”

In summary, it states that a brahmana should never take the life of any creature however, a kshatriya may do so as it may be required to ensure proper rule of law and order.

Vana Parva :

In the Vana Parva, Markandya Muni is narrating the discussion between a brahamana named Kausika and a poultry-monger named Dharmavyadha who lived in Mithila. The Kausika asks the fowler ‘How shall I know what is virtuous conduct.’ In answering, Dharmavyadha states that :
काललॊभ गरहाकीर्णां पञ्चेन्थ्रिय जलां नथीम
नावं धृतिमयीं कृत्वा जन्म थुर्गाणि संतर
करमेण संचितॊ धर्मॊ बुथ्धियॊगमयॊ महान
शिष्टाचारे भवेत साधू रागः शुक्लेव वाससि

[Mahabharata 3.198.67-68]
” Among holy men, virtue is differentiated in three ways–that great virtue which is inculcated in the Vedas, the other which is inculcated in the dharma shastra, and virtuous conduct And virtuous conduct is indicated by acquisition of knowledge, pilgrimage to sacred places, truthfulness, forbearance, purity and straight-forwardness. ”

He continues:
अहिंसा सत्यवचनं सर्वभूतहितं परम
अहिंसा परमॊ धर्मः स च सत्ये परतिष्ठितः
सत्ये कृत्वा परतिष्ठां तु परवर्तन्ते परवृत्तयः
[Mahabharata 3.198.69]

” Virtuous men are always kind to all creatures, and well-disposed towards regenerate men. They abstain from doing injury to any creature, and are never rude in speech. Those good men who know well the consequences of the fruition of their good and evil deeds, are commended by virtuous men. ”
This particular quotation uses ahimsa in the sense of not doing injury to any creature and states that it is applied to ‘holy men’ who are typically defined to be ascetics and sometimes as brahamanas.

Anusasana Parva :

In the Anusasana Parva, Yudhisthira is asked by Lord Krishna to ask Bhishma any questions he may have as this will be his last opportunity to do so. Yudhisthira states that Bhishma has told him that ‘ahimsa paramo dharma’ and is asking about it in the context of conducting sraddha in which meat is offered.
अहिंसा परमॊ धर्म इत्य उक्तं बहुशस तवया
शराथ्धेषु च भवान आह पितॄन आमिष काङ्क्षिणः

[Mahabharata 13.116.1]

” Thou hast told it many times that abstention from injury is the highest religion. In Sraddhas, however, that are performed in honour of the Pitris, persons for their own good should make offerings of diverse kinds of meat. ”

Yudhisthira asks how can killing be avoided if meat is to be offered in offering sraddha in honor of ancestors ?
Bhishma answers by stating that absention from eating meat is a great sacrifice and provides many benefits. He goes on to state that
परजानां हितकामेन तव अगस्त्येन महात्मना
आरण्याः सर्वथैवत्याः परॊक्षितास तपसा मृगाः
करिया हय एवं न हीयन्ते पितृथैवतसंश्रिताः
परीयन्ते पितरश चैव नयायतॊ मांसतर्पिताः

[ Mahabharata 13.116.56-57]
” Desirous of benefiting all men, the high-souled Agastya, by the aid of his penances, dedicated, once for all, all wild animals of the deer species to the deities. Hence, there is no longer any necessity of sanctifying those animals for offering them to the deities and the Pitris. ”

After hearing his answer in full, Yudhisthira repeats his question “…O grandsire, what is flesh, of what substances it is, the merits that attach to abstention from it, and what the demerits are that attach to the eating of flesh.”
Bhishma again answers and concludes with “Hence, a person of cleansed soul should be compassionate to all living creatures…”
अहिंसा परमॊ धर्मस तदाहिंसा परॊ थमः
अहिंसा परमं थानम अहिंसा परमस तपः
अहिंसा परमॊ यज्ञस तदाहिस्मा परं बलम
अहिंसा परमं मित्रम अहिंसा परमं सुखम
अहिंसा परमं सत्यम अहिंसा परमं शरुतम
सर्वयज्ञेषु वा थानं सर्वतीर्देषु चाप्लुतम
सर्वथानफलं वापि नैतत तुल्यम अहिंसया
अहिंस्रस्य तपॊ ऽकषय्यम अहिंस्रॊ यजते सथा
अहिंस्रः सर्वभूतानां यदा माता यदा पिता
एतत फलम अहिंसाया भूयश च कुरुपुंगव
न हि शक्या गुणा वक्तुम इह वर्षशतैर अपि

[ Mahabharata 13.117.37-41]
” Abstention from cruelty is the highest Religion. Abstention from cruelty is the highest self-control. Abstention from cruelty is the highest gift. Abstention from cruelty is the highest penance. Abstention from cruelty is the highest sacrifice. Abstention from cruelty is the highest puissance. Abstention from cruelty is the highest friend. Abstention from cruelty is the highest happiness. Abstention from cruelty is the highest truth. Abstention from cruelty is the highest Sruti. Gifts made in all sacrifices, ablutions performed in all sacred waters, and the merit that one acquires from making all kinds of gifts mentioned in the scriptures,–all these do not come up to abstention from cruelty (in point of the merit that attaches to it). The penances of a man that abstains from cruelty are inexhaustible. The man that abstains from cruelty is regarded as always performing sacrifices. The man that abstains from cruelty is the father and mother of all creatures. Even these, O chief of Kuru’s race, are some of the merits of abstention from cruelty. Altogether, the merits that attach to it are so many that they are incapable of being exhausted even if one were to speak for a hundred years. ”
Here ahimsa is translated as abstention from cruelty in relation to killing for the sake of eating the flesh of the killed animal for personal pleasure. In essence, Bhishma is stating that it is very beneficial to be vegetarian because thereby there is no cruelty to animals.

Bhagavad Gita :
“Ahimsa paramo dharma” is not mentioned in the Bhagavad Gita as is frequently cited. The word Ahimsa is mentioned four times in the Gita. [ Gita 10.5, 13.8, 16.2, and 17.14]
The Gita begins with Arjuna telling Krishna that he is despondent and unwilling to fight the war. In this discussion, Lord Krishna repeatedly tells Arjuna to get up and fight. One such statement is:
अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि
ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि [Bhagavad Gita 2.33]
” If, however, you do not fight this righteous war, then you will certainly incur sins for neglecting your duties and thus lose your reputation as a fighter. ”
Had the Lord said ‘Ahimsa paramo dharma’ than the war would have ended before it began because he would have effectively been stating that there is no need to fight because the greater dharma is non-violence.

The great irony:

(Words Of Swami Vivekananda)
” See the irony of it. Jesus Christ, the God of the Europeans, has taught: Have no enemy, bless them that curse you; whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also; stop all your work and be ready for the next world; the end of the world is near at hand. And our Lord in the Gita is Rousing Call to Hindu Nation saying: Always work with great enthusiasm, destroy your enemies and enjoy the world. But, after all, it turned out to be exactly the reverse of what Christ or Krishna implied. ”
” The Europeans never took the words of Jesus Christ seriously. Always of active habits, being possessed of a tremendous Râjasika nature, they are gathering with great enterprise and youthful ardor the comforts and luxuries of the different countries of the world and enjoying them to their hearts’ content. And we are sitting in a corner, with our bag and baggage, pondering on death day and night, and singing: ” Very tremulous and unsteady is the water on the lotus-leaf; so is the life of man frail and transient ” – with the result that it is making our blood run cold and our flesh creep with the fear of Yama, the god of death; and Yama, too, alas, has taken us at our word, as it were – plague and all sorts of maladies have entered into our country ! ”
” Who are following the teachings of the Gita ? – The Europeans. And who are acting according to the will of Jesus Christ ? – The descendants of Shri Krishna ! This must be well understood. ”
” It is only the Vedic religion which considers ways and means and lays down rules for the fourfold attainment of man, comprising Dharma, Artha, Kama, and Moksha. Buddha ruined us, and so did Christ ruin Greece and Rome ! Then, in due course of time, fortunately, the Europeans became Protestants, shook off the teachings of Christ as represented by Papal authority, and heaved a sigh of relief. ”

Conclusion :
“Ahimsa Paramo Dharma” can only be practiced by Sannyasins who tread the path of Nivritti Marga. It cannot be strictly practiced by householders. If someone enters the house and molests a lady, a householder cannot keep quiet. Similarly, in a war, a soldier cannot put down his weapons. In either case, practicing Ahimsa would be Adharma, not Dharma. Similarly, a king must protect his subjects even if it requires violence to punish criminals or going to war with neighboring kingdoms if they attack.

Lord Krishna states:

परित्राणाय साधूनां विनाशाय च दुष्कृताम्
धर्मसंस्थापनार्थाय सम्भवामि युगे युगे [Bhagavad Gita 4.22]

” To deliver the pious and to annihilate the miscreants, as well as to reestablish the principles of religion, I Myself appear, age after age. ”

The Lord clearly states that Ahimsa, while highly regarded, is not the highest Dharma for everyone and certainly not for Arjun on the battlefield of Kurukshetra.
Absolutely Hindus are peace lover , But it depends whether you want Sri Krisha with playing flutes or having Sudarshan , Mahadev in Meditation or in the form of Mahakaal….
“Om Shanti Shanti Shanti”

3 comments on “Non-Violence In Sanatan Dharma

  1. Pingback: Non violence in Santana dharm explained. – Voice of world

  2. Guest
    March 20, 2018

    I think that the thing is more human-related.
    I mean, Mahakala will one day execute every living being releasing HorseFire from the Meru Mountain, thus unleashing MahaPralaya
    If the Brahman is really unaffected by gunas, somebody who realizes the inherent emptiness of all meanings could kill even without necessity, and all of this without getting his karma stained, not even a bit
    But compassion too is an attribute of Absolute Good,isn’t it?
    Therefore I think that it should tamper exceedingly destructive non-dualistic (and therefore a bit too uncaring) behaviours, not because entities possess an inherent amkara (personal self) but because it would be quite an ass-hole behaviour to act elsewhere


  3. Sanatan Dharm and Hinduism
    November 24, 2018

    Reblogged this on GLOBAL HINDUISM.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

I'm just starting out; leave me a comment or a like :)


Follow me on Twitter

type="text/javascript" data-cfasync="false" /*/* */
%d bloggers like this: